In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. Frontiers | Editors between Support and Control by the Digital Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. good . If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. 771 BCE: Start of the Eastern Zhou dynasty (and the 'Spring and Autumn Annals' period) in China 753 BCE: The Founding of Rome 594 BCE: Solon is appointed archon of Athens and proposes popular reforms; a system of land taxation introduced in the state of Lu, China 575 BCE: Servius Tullius becomes King of Rome 560 BCE: Peisistratus seizes the Acropolis, makes himself tyrant of Athens, but is . Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. good luck!! To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. The American School : From The Puritans To The Trump Era [PDF However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. My experiences with these journals have not been this positive. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. All Rights Reserved. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start. Improve this answer. Editorial process : Springer Support Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. 1124. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. Manuscript rejection: A problem or an opportunity? I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. You said the finals started tomorrow. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! The handbookis available from R Upskill, a sister brand providing learning programs for various aspects of a researchers work, including writing, submission, publication, and research promotion. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript Thank you for visiting nature.com. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. sciencenature - //-->Prophecies Fulfilled: The Qur'anic Arabs in the Early 600s Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. //--> My thesis aimed to study dynamic agrivoltaic systems, in my case in arboriculture. In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. We suggest that authors send proofs to co-authors for them to check, but request that changes among the co-authors are coordinated so that only one author communicates with Nature and only one set of corrections is sent. Either rejection or sending it out for review. And hope you hear from the journal soon! Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. n - volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. //-->How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. resubmitnoveltyappeal, Resubmitpoint-by-pointresponse letterresubmitresponse letterresubmitresponse letternature, Proofreadingresubmit, Proofreadinglicence to publish, NatureNatureNature, wileynature science, Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review, Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewgetNature Communicationsget50%Nature Communicaitons, sciencenature.